Why this matters?
Whether you're in the UK or South Africa, the story is similar: legal frameworks exist, but specific guidance on how to vet online risk is often missing. In South Africa, POPIA outlines data handling laws, but not how schools should navigate digital checks. In the UK, KCSIE recommends online searches but leaves the "how" up to interpretation. That leaves each institution to create its own process.
Some might Google a name or ask around to see if any existing staff know them. Others may not go beyond a criminal record check.
...and in that inconsistency lies risk. A lot of it.
As our customer base grows across both regions, we’re seeing the same theme: safeguarding decisions increasingly hinge on what isn’t found. For this reason, understanding the dark web and the exposures that come with ignoring it, is so important.
What a Dark Web check actually looks for
For those less familiar with the dark web, it’s a part of the internet that is not indexed by search engines. It includes forums, encrypted chat channels, and data markets where harmful material is shared. There are billions of open source data points that can tell you a lot if you know how and where to look.
Safehire.ai's complex neural network looks for red flags like associations with hate groups, extremist content, online abuse, or links to child exploitation material. The predators, criminals and fraudsters that exist here will have a well-curated surface web presence, a sparkling CV, glowing references, and (if they haven't been caught yet), a clean police record.
Searching the dark web: the old (and expensive) way
Until recently, dark web background checks were slow, niche, and - as I have said - eye-wateringly expensive.
👉 Cost per check: £300 to £800 (approx R6,900 - R18,400)
👉 Skillset: experienced intelligence analyst (this is an expensive person)
👉 Turnaround: 1–5 working days
👉 Scalability: Near impossible. Schools couldn’t afford to check every hire.
That meant these checks were mostly used for executive hires or criminal investigations. Not everyday safeguarding.
Searching the dark web: the faster, smarter, cheaper way
In 2024 we reinvented safer background checks. The rise of AI made it cheaper to build something called a complex neural network. This (very cool) structure mimics the synapses of the human brain and allows us to train AI to search in the same way as those expensive intelligence analysts search. Only now, instead of doing dozens of searches a day, we could now do thousands.
Enter Echo. The world’s first low-cost AI-powered dark web check, designed for regulated organisations. It automates the heavy lifting, using machine learning to scan billions of data points across the dark web.
While this is paradigm-shifting, these sorts of decisions should not be left solely in the hands of a machine. We have therefore kept a human-in-the-loop. Each red flag report is reviewed by a human analyst before it’s shared with the customer. We expect around 1 in 5000 reports to be a red flag, so this is very scalable.
So what used to take a team of specialists now happens in:
👉 Time: 24–72 hours
👉 Cost: £20 to £35 (approx R460 - R800)
👉 Scale: Affordable enough to run across all staff, not just senior roles
The Real Cost of Not Checking
Although Safehire.ai has fundamentally reduced the cost of dark web background checks, for key regulated sectors, the true cost lies not in the price of a background check but in the potential consequences of missing a warning sign. A failure to identify an online risk can lead to serious reputational, financial, and legal damage, far outweighing the cost of preventative vetting.
Safehire.ai makes this level of protection accessible, affordable, and practical. By combining AI-driven intelligence with safeguarding insight, this means organisations now move from reactive checks to proactive risk prevention, protecting not just reputations but the people they serve and protect.
If you’d like to learn more, let’s chat.


.png)
.png)
.png)


